Blog

Aldi Grocery Store MilwaukeeMilwaukee, Wis. – Nazir Al-mujaahid, a law-abiding Wisconsin concealed carry license holder, used his sidearm to shoot a shotgun-weilding armed robber who had entered a north-side Aldi’s grocery store in Milwaukee and threatened the cashier and customers on January 30th, 2012.  As is standard protocol, the armed citizen’s holster, gun, and ammunition were taken into evidence by the Milwaukee Police Department.

Listen to Concealed Wisconsin’s Interview With Nazier.

A few days later the Milwaukee District Attorney’s office cleared the armed citizen of any wrong-doing and declared the shooting justified.

Despite being exhonerated by the DA, making repeated attempts to obtain the return of his firearm from Milwaukee Police, and sending a letter to the DA’s office requesting assistance in the return of his property, Mr. Al-Mujaahid’s gun remains in Police possession.

Wisconsin Carry, Inc. has observed what appears to be a pattern of civil-rights infringing behavior from the Milwaukee Police Department. The Milwaukee Police Department appears to have a practice of concocting baseless reasons to seize any and all guns they come across in the City – even when those guns have never been used in connection with a crime. The Police Department also appears to have a practice of refusing to return firearms or unduly delaying the return of firearms that were seized incident to an arrest despite the fact that no charges were brought or when the gun owner is exonerated by the court system.

WCI believes that these acts by the Milwaukee Police Department represent violations to law-abiding citizens constitutionally guaranteed right to be free from illegal seizures of their private property and their Constitutionally recognized right to keep and bear arms.

As Wisconsin Carry considers whether legal action against the City of Milwaukee is justified or required to correct this apparent illegal and immoral behavior, we call on the Milwaukee Police Department to return Mr. Al-Majaahid’s gun to him without delay.

For More Information Contact:
Nik Clark, President
Wisconsin Carry, Inc.

Ask Mayor Tom Barrett and the members of Common Council Public Safety to side with the law-abiding citizen who defended himself and others from a shotgun-wielding thug and implore Milwaukee Police to return the “Aldi’s armed citizen”, Nazir’s gun to him immediately.

Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett:
(414) 286.2200 – mayor@milwaukee.gov

Milwaukee Common Council Public Safety Committee:

The Public Safety Committee is concerned with issues brought forth from the fire, police, health and neighborhood services departments.

Members:

Ald. Robert G. Donovan, Chair
(414) 286-2221 – E-mail rdonov@milwaukee.gov

Ald. Robert W. Puente, Vice Chair
(414) 286-2221 – E-mail rpuent@milwaukee.gov

Ald. Terry L. Witkowski
(414) 286-8537 – E-mail twitko@milwaukee.gov

Ald. James N. Witkowiak
E-mail jwitko@milwaukee.gov

Ald. Joe Davis, Sr.
(414) 286-2221 E-mail jldavis@milwaukee.gov

“Wisconsin Carry, Inc. will continue to use an “all of the above” approach to advancing and protecting the right to carry of law-abiding Wisconsin residents.  This approach will include civil litigation, public relations, grass-roots legislative activism, and education/training.” - Nik Clark

{ 0 comments }

February 12, 2012 (MADISON, Wis.) — The Wisconsin Department of Justice announced that they have regained the upper hand on the mountain of concealed carry license applications and are finally meeting Act 35′s deadlines.

Wisconsin’s concealed carry law, Act 35, states that the Department of Justice shall process applications received before Nov. 30 within 45 days and any applications received after that date must be processed within 21 days.

With the obvious popularity of the new law and tens-of-thousands of applications flooding into the Department’s Madison office, they quickly staffed up to meet the demand, but by December 29th, they had already fallen behind.

As of February 11, however, the Department of Justice is back in compliance with the law. According to Law Enforcement Services Division Administrator Brian O’Keefe, the Department of Justice hired 11 new employees in January to keep up on processing applications.   According to reports, applications fell as far back as 5 days.

Copyright © 2012

{ 0 comments }

Milwaukee, WI -  (January 30, 2012) Two armed robbery suspects were unable to get the cash they came into the Aldi Store at N. 76th St. and W. Villard Ave., despite being heavily armed with shot guns.  All because of a quick thinking 36 year old Wisconsin Concealed Carry License holder, who stopped the robbery with his own gun.  Now he faces possible charges, not because he stopped the robbery, but because Aldi Stores are posted with a “No Weapons Sign” on the door – which could turn this hero into a criminal.

Updated information – As of February 2, 2012 – the Milwaukee DA will not press charges against the shooter.

Aldi Grocery Store MilwaukeeViolating a posted sign on a business can get you into some trouble, likely a trespassing charge and forfeiture (fine) – but it isn’t a criminal act as described by some in the media.  Most of the time you’d just be asked to leave or possibly talking to the police who may issue you a forfeiture violation.

While Concealed Wisconsin doesn’t endorse violating a businesses wishes, we do encourage our listeners to shop someplace else instead of a business that hangs a sign out telling criminals that “it is safe to rob this place – we’ve kicked out anyone with a gun that might stop you!”

Armed RobberyAs Aldi found out on Monday, signs don’t stop criminals from robbing your store at Gun point and it is likely that they were targeted because of the sign on their door.  Many businesses, especially in Milwaukee and Madison, have decided to make a statement against the new concealed carry law and post their business with a sign.

Second Amendment advocates, like the listeners of Concealed Wisconsin, have politely been telling businesses that they’ve lost their business (and alienated 60,000 people in Wisconsin) because they are violating their constitutional right to protect themselves, their families, and others.  According to members of the gun advocacy group, Wisconsin Carry, Inc., many businesses have changed their positions on the matter after a short discussion about the new law.

As of today, Aldi continues to post their stores and has made no comments other than than they are thankful no employees or customers were hurt in the incident.  In my opinion, it is unfortunate that they have not publicly thanked the customer who stopped the armed robbery and offered him free groceries for a year.  That however isn’t likely anytime soon.

As of February 2nd, the unidentified customer/hero has not been arrested or charged with a crime, but has met with the District Attorney to discuss the incident.  According to reports, this Aldi Store had 2 security guards, but neither of them were armed and they were not a deterrent to a violent crime.  After the 2 men entered the store with Shot Guns demanding money, the only thing that stopped the criminal before they turned the gun on a clerk or customer was an armed citizen.

Police have both suspects in custody, the 20 year old suspect suffered gunshot wounds and is recovering.  The unidentified customer has indicated that he is fearful for his safety, because he may become the target of retaliation by the suspects friends.

Please share this story with a friend and please leave a comment…what would you do in the same situation?

~ Andy

{ 3 comments }

LANCASTER COUNTY, S.C.
December 28, 2011

Beverly Hope MeltonHope Melton, a 30 year old woman, stopped at a convenience store in the town of Jefferson, unaware that a violent man was watching her.  That man, 23 year old Nickolas Jermaine Miller,  was seen in surveillance video in the convenience store harassing  Melton before she left.  He was also seen on the tape, following her car as she left the parking lot.

According to Melton’s brother-in-law Juan Garces.“She did not know him. There was never a conversation with him,” said  “She had no indication she was in any danger.”

Miller, the man charged with abducting, raping and killing Melton was seen on surveillance video opening the store’s door for Melton, purchasing a beer and sitting in his car in waiting for her to leave.  When Melton finished pumping her gas, she left and Miller followed in his SUV.  Melton turned on to Angelus Road, heading to her grandmother’s house when she likely noticed that she was being followed.

She called her grandmother to tell her she saw a car following her and to let her know something was wrong, very wrong.  But, by the time they got to her location, all they found was her in the ditch, wheels spinning in reverse.

Murder InvestigationInvestigators suspect that Miller drove around Melton’s car, cutting her off and sent her into the ditch.  It is believed that she got out of the vehicle trying to flee from Miller, but he was able to catch her and force her into his SUV.  According to investigators, Miller then raped Melton and beat her to death with a baseball bat.  Her body was found in a secluded area of Kershaw County after Miller led Chesterfield County deputies to it.

Miller is currently in police custody in Kershaw County.  According to Kershaw County Sheriff Jim Matthews, Miller had confessed and let authorities to Melton’s body.  His bond has not been set because he could receive the death penalty for the charges he faces, which will likely include kidnapping, criminal sexual conduct, and murder.

This is a senseless tragedy and unfortunately Hope Melton can not be brought back to life to do things differently, but I hope that we, as a pro-gun – pro-self defense community, will evaluate our own vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of our wives, girl friends, daughters, and female friends and encourage them to learn to protect themselves from violent encounters like Hope Melton experienced.  No one should ever have to experience what she did and I hope no one I know ever will…especially not on my watch.

Would a Firearm have saved the South Carolina women kidnapped, raped, and beaten to death?

This tragedy begs the question, “what if she had a gun?”   What if Hope Melton was a licensed concealed carry gun owner who choose to arm herself that day?  Would she still be alive today to tell the story?  I say yes!  And this should be a wake up call for women to choose ‘not to be a victim.’

Not a Victim!By evaluating this story, I mean no disrespect to Hope Melton’s family, but I do want consider the scenario under different conditions.

It is safe to say that people who choose to carry a weapon for self defense tend to be more alert to suspicious people, uncomfortable circumstances, and potential crimes.  In fact, they tend to carry themselves differently.  They can be less attractive as a target, because they are “too alert” and there are easier targets out there.

However, being alert doesn’t mean criminals won’t target you; some criminals, like Nickolas Jermaine Miller were willing to go to extremes to accomplish his plans and being alert would not have enough to deter him.

So, let’s re-evaluate the scenario, but this time we’ll give Hope Melton a gun.

Up until she was being followed, she didn’t do anything that most people would not have done themselves.  It is a bit sketchy, but some reports say she was being harassed in the store by the perpetrator.   This should have put her on high alert and may have justified a call to 911, but probably not by most people and it is questionable that the police would have done anything since a crime had not been committed…yet.

Also, his willingness to force her into the ditch in broad daylight is an indicator that he was very determined, violent, and experienced.   He wasn’t going to be deterred.

Once she felt threatened enough to call her grandmother, she was aware she was being followed.  As a Concealed Carry Licensee, this would have been her first opportunity to prepare to defend herself against the potential attack.  Readying her weapon by making it easily accessible, but (remember the crash in the ditch) keeping it securely holstered.  Once she had her weapon accessible for immediate use, she should have called 911 and continued driving to a safe location like a populated area, police station, or fire station.  Since the perpetrator forced her off the road, she had no opportunity to escape.

Once in the ditch, she exited her car and tried to flee.  This put her in a vulnerable position, but was reasonable in her mind because she was unarmed and wanted to escape.  I would have perhaps stayed in the car and tried to buy time by honking the horn, finding a pen or other sharp item to use as weapon, etc.  The more noise and time spent getting you out of the car may cause him to flee, but there is no guarantees.

In our scenario, however, she is armed and ready to defend herself.  

Let’s assume she only has seconds to react (probable), but has already prepared herself mentally for the potential encounter.  The SUV begins picking up speed as though to pass.  She has already readied/secured her weapon, called her grandmother and has 911 on the phone to alert them of the danger and is attempting to find a populated location to avoid any altercation.

As the driver passes, he swerves into her lane forcing her into the ditch.  She is scared, but physically ok and can see the driver moving towards her car.  Her weapon is securely holstered, but still accessible and she immediately upholsters it and draws on the approaching man giving loud verbal commands that both he and the 911 officer can hear.  Stop!  I am armed! I will shoot!

He is not deterred and only approaches faster.  As he reaches for her door to open it, she opens fire on him through the window, striking 3 times in the chest dropping him instantly.  This all may take place in 3-10 seconds, but seem like an eternity.

It takes a few moments, but as she continues to cover his body with her weapon, she finds her phone and tells the operator she needs immediate help, an ambulance, and that she has shot the perpetrator and is still armed, but will have her weapon secured (location) when officers arrive.

To successfully accomplish this, she would have had to mentally prepare beforehand with training.

She hangs up the phone, not wanting to give too many details in her current state.  She makes 2 important calls.  First calling her lawyer to get professional legal counsel ASAP and then calling her family to tell them to say nothing to the media or police with out the presence of their lawyer.

Several minutes later, the police finally arrive on scene.  Knowing that they are coming in ‘hot’ and may not know the circumstances of the shooting, she assumes they may see her as a threat.  Her firearm is secured in the location she told the operator and she has her hands in the air as they approach the scene.

As they begin their investigation on scene, she firmly, but politely says she wants her lawyer present before answer any questions.  No comments, statements, or remarks!  They can all be used against you!

“I’m sorry, but I need my lawyer present before I answer your questions.”

Although this scenario is fictional, it is the alternative to what actually happened.  Hope Melton would be going home to her husband and family and with some time and counseling, would move past the tragedy and put her life back together.

~ I’m interested in your thoughts.  What do you think?

Please leave a comment on this post, share it on Facebook, or leave a Voice mail message telling me your take.

Andy
Concealed Wisconsin

{ 5 comments }

City of Madison to pay $10,000 for Open Carry incident at Culver’s Restaurant

December 21, 2011

December 20, 2011 Madison, WI On September 18, 2010 five law abiding Wisconsin residents were peacefully having dinner at a Culver’s Restaurant in Madison, Wisconsin. These 5 individuals, who were legally openly carrying as provided by Wisconsin law had finished their dinner and were preparing to leave the restaurant when they were unlawfully detained by [...]

1 comment Full Post Here →

Sheriff’s department has concealed weapon scenario-based training for traffic stops

December 14, 2011

Concealed Wisconsin Commentary by Andy Anderson Originally Posted in The Northwestern As the new Concealed Carry law goes into full effect, sheriffs departments are retraining deputies on the proper procedures for stopping drivers carrying a concealed weapon.  The training involves role playing realistic traffic stop scenarios with other deputies playing the part of verbally non-compliant [...]

1 comment Full Post Here →

Michelle Obama’s Warning to Gun Owners – Just My Opinion

November 28, 2011

Today is November 28, 2011 and we are now less than 12 months from the election of the next President of the United States of America. We’ve clearly seen the agenda of our sitting President, Barack Obama, and know that he would like to “fundamentally change” our country. In fact he’s already done that, but not without the resistance of many constitutionalists, patriots, libertarians, republicans and even some democrats. Because of those of us who stand up for the constitution, the fundamental change has been less severe than it could have been.

1 comment Full Post Here →

Lawmakers vote to suspend concealed carry training requirement despite Van Hollen’s objections

November 7, 2011

MADISON, Wis. — Applicants to carry concealed weapons in Wisconsin will no longer have to complete four hours of training, after a Republican-controlled legislative committee voted Monday to do away with the requirement that had been assailed by the National Rifle Association as being too strict. The rule mandating the successful completion of at least [...]

1 comment Full Post Here →

Wisconsin Law Makes Electronic Weapons a Non-Lethal Option – Taser C2 Top of My List

October 27, 2011

On November 1, 2011, you’ll finally be able to apply for your concealed weapons license to carry a gun, but the law also includes other weapons as well. With a license, you’ll be able to conceal a gun, knife, billy club, and electronic weapon to protect you or a love one from a violent attack. Each one of these weapons have a specific application in a self defense scenario and all are dangerous, but not all are necessarily lethal if used correctly.

0 comments Full Post Here →

Wisconsin Concealed Carry Law – Important Information

July 13, 2011

Note: this post will not be updated.  See the FAQ page. Since the Wisconsin Senate passed SB-93 on June 14, 2011, there have been questions and answers floating around the internet regarding the contents of the now signed law called Act 35. Unfortunately, many of the answer are not accurate and the information  come packaged [...]

Full Post Here →